In a shocking turn of events that absolutely nobody saw coming, local self-proclaimed social justice warrior Samantha L. has announced that she fervently believes in the importance of every individual’s voice being heard—as long as that voice agrees with her opinions and beliefs. In a statement given through her Instagram live video (because who even watches the news anymore?), Samantha detailed her newfound love for inclusivity, freedom of expression, and, of course, shutting down any and all dissenting opinions.
“I mean, of course everyone deserves a platform,” she began, sipping from a sustainably sourced matcha latte. “But if you’re, like, spreading hate, or you’re just wrong in general—like really wrong—then it’s our duty as a society to cancel you immediately.”
Samantha’s comment has raised more than a few eyebrows, especially among those who had the audacity to think that free speech applied to literally everyone.
Inclusivity Means Agreeing With Me
Samantha has long been a self-proclaimed defender of marginalized communities, marching in protests, signing petitions, and reposting infographics on her social media at a rate that can only be described as “heroic.” She maintains that she’s fighting for the rights of all, but recent conversations with her have revealed a very specific condition attached to that fight: alignment with her exact worldview. Any deviation from her prescribed beliefs? Well, you’re clearly part of the problem.
“It’s really about accountability,” Samantha explained, already drafting up a scathing tweet. “We can’t let people spread dangerous ideas like, you know, questioning my interpretation of feminism or—God forbid—suggesting that cancel culture might be going too far. Some things are just too important to debate.”
“We need to elevate marginalized voices,” she explained, “but if you disagree with my views, I don’t care what group you’re from—you’re getting muted, blocked, and, if I’m really feeling it, publicly shamed on all platforms. It’s the only way to protect freedom of speech.”
This is not the first time Samantha has made headlines in the local activist scene. Last year, she led a protest against free-range chickens after discovering that their “range” wasn’t exactly defined by the chickens themselves. The movement was eventually called off after she realized nobody in her group was sure what they were protesting about anymore. “We just knew something was wrong,” she said at the time.
The Rise of “Selective Free Speech”
Samantha’s latest crusade has drawn the ire of some, particularly those who assumed freedom of expression was a two-way street. Critics have pointed out that Samantha’s version of inclusivity seems less about creating space for marginalized voices and more about making sure her voice is the loudest in the room.
“I tried to have a calm conversation with her about differing viewpoints,” said Tim M., a former friend. “The next thing I knew, she had publicly labeled me a ‘misogynistic alt-right apologist’ on Twitter, even though all I did was question her stance on artisanal oat milk.”
Despite the backlash, Samantha remains undeterred. Her resolve seems to grow stronger with every critical comment she receives online—comments that are swiftly deleted, of course. After all, she’s on a mission, and who has time to engage with people who disagree with you?
“This isn’t censorship,” she clarified, her finger hovering over the block button. “It’s about protecting people from harmful, toxic ideas. And by ‘toxic ideas,’ I mean anything that doesn’t come directly from me or people who think exactly like me.”
“Cancel Culture” Gets a Rebrand
Samantha has also rebranded cancel culture as “consequence culture,” a term that makes it easier to justify the virtual obliteration of anyone with an opposing viewpoint. “It’s not about silencing people,” she said, with a straight face. “It’s about ensuring that the world is a safe space for my ideas and my ideas only.”
Her reasoning? Some opinions, she argues, are too dangerous to allow in the public sphere, particularly if they challenge her carefully curated view of the world. “You can’t just let people say whatever they want,” she explained. “What if someone starts questioning the validity of my favorite organic vegan skincare line? That kind of misinformation has real-world consequences!”
“It’s like, sure, people have rights or whatever, but what about my right to feel morally superior to literally everyone around me? Honestly, how dare you suggest otherwise.”
Samantha has become a vocal proponent of the “cancel first, ask questions never” approach to discourse. In her view, it’s not enough to debate those with opposing viewpoints—silencing them outright is the only way to ensure progress.
Her supporters—whom she lovingly refers to as “woke warriors”—have praised her bravery in the face of anyone who dares to question her. Critics, however, have labeled her approach as hypocritical at best, and dictatorial at worst. But Samantha is unfazed. After all, she knows what’s best for society, and she’s not afraid to use the block button to enforce it.
Leave a comment